I want you to check out this list of the "50 Greatest Conservative Rock Songs" from John J. Miller, not for its quality, but as an illustration of how a person's perception gets warped from viewing the world through the purely political prism. My beef here is with the inclusion of #23: Ben Folds’s “Brick.” Miller’s description reads:
Written from the perspective of a man who takes his young girlfriend to an abortion clinic, this song describes the emotional scars of “reproductive freedom” [the snarky quotation marks are duly noted, jerk -- JB]: “Now she’s feeling more alone / Than she ever has before. . . . As weeks went by / It showed that she was not fine.”
Yes, the song exudes a plaintive, regretful vibe. Certainly it is no “I’m Every Woman”-style celebration of abortion. But only a fool would argue that the narrator's (or songwriter's) expression of anguish equals a political statement against abortion. It’s an open question as to whether the couple would be better off being forced instead to have the child, isn’t it? And wouldn't it be wise to make the distinction between struggling with a decision in its aftermath and wishing away the legal right to make it?
Calling “Brick” a conservative anthem against abortion is like suggesting that Jimi Hendrix’s “Hey Joe” is some liberal plea for gun control. Please, just cut that shit out. Each song tells a tale of personal woe and despair, and perhaps they are cautionary in nature, but the subtexts are scarcely political. Which you'd realize if you actually listened to them with appreciation instead of torturously seeking affirmation of your dreary philosophy.
And I doubt most composers would appreciate your co-opting their work and reducing their artistry to cheap slogans and simplistic interpretations.
So my advice to you, John J. Miller, is: listen to the music. And quit politicizing…EVERYTHING.
Written from the perspective of a man who takes his young girlfriend to an abortion clinic, this song describes the emotional scars of “reproductive freedom” [the snarky quotation marks are duly noted, jerk -- JB]: “Now she’s feeling more alone / Than she ever has before. . . . As weeks went by / It showed that she was not fine.”
Yes, the song exudes a plaintive, regretful vibe. Certainly it is no “I’m Every Woman”-style celebration of abortion. But only a fool would argue that the narrator's (or songwriter's) expression of anguish equals a political statement against abortion. It’s an open question as to whether the couple would be better off being forced instead to have the child, isn’t it? And wouldn't it be wise to make the distinction between struggling with a decision in its aftermath and wishing away the legal right to make it?
Calling “Brick” a conservative anthem against abortion is like suggesting that Jimi Hendrix’s “Hey Joe” is some liberal plea for gun control. Please, just cut that shit out. Each song tells a tale of personal woe and despair, and perhaps they are cautionary in nature, but the subtexts are scarcely political. Which you'd realize if you actually listened to them with appreciation instead of torturously seeking affirmation of your dreary philosophy.
And I doubt most composers would appreciate your co-opting their work and reducing their artistry to cheap slogans and simplistic interpretations.
So my advice to you, John J. Miller, is: listen to the music. And quit politicizing…EVERYTHING.
3 comments:
Yeah, this John J. Miller seems like quite the pinhead. If it isn't bad enough that the article seems both smug and desperate, Miller's analysis is so fundamentally wrong on some of these songs. As you note, a lot of these songs are personal tales that may be cautionary, but can hardly be construed as political anthems or affirmations. My biggest beef is with his deconstruction of the Who's "Won't Get Fooled Again", which points out the biggest flaw of his arguments -- a lot of these supposedly "conservative" values aren't restricted to conservatives. He notes, "The conservative movement is full of disillusioned revolutionaries; this could be their theme song, an oath that swears off naïve idealism once and for all." Uh, Mr. Miller--newsflash--every political movement has disillusioned revolutionaries. I think the essence of rock is rebellion against the status quo, no matter who's in power. I would love to see this guy put his money where his mouth is -- I would gladly pay money to see and hear Metallica played at the next Republican rally of any sort. It would last all of 2 seconds. And to be fair, the same could be said of a Democratic rally. Essentially, this article reads as a moron's effort to prove he is not a moron.
John Miller is the Assistant Director of Public Affairs for the FBI. Miller is a former ABC News reporter and anchor. He conducted a famous May 1998 interview with Osama Bin Laden in Afghanistan.
Miller attended the Emerson College for one year. He began work as a journalist in 1973 for WNEW sportsbook in New York City. Miller cut his teeth as an investigative journalist for WNBC from 1985 to 1994. He is regarded as an expert on organized crime, especially the Mafia, and also on domestic and international terror groups.
http://www.enterbet.com
Born in Detroit, Miller was raised in both Michigan and Florida. He was educated at the University of Michigan, where he was the editor in chief of the conservative student newspaper the Michigan Review.Costa rica toursHe currently resides in Prince William County, Virginia.Miller is also the former vice president of the Center for Equal Opportunity and the recipient of a Bradley fellowship from the Heritage Foundation.
http://www.kingtours.com
Post a Comment